A Meeting That Missed the Moment: CARICOM Leaders Sit With Washington While Cuba Stands Alone
When the Prime Minister of Trinidad and Tobago and the President of Guyana met with the President of the United States, the headlines framed it as “regional diplomacy.” But many across the Caribbean are asking a deeper question: diplomacy for whom? And at what cost to Caribbean unity, sovereignty, and […]
<img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Cuba-alone-1024x683.jpeg" alt="" class="wp-image-17910" style="aspect-ratio:1.4993160054719563;width:311px;height:auto" srcset="https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Cuba-alone-1024x683.jpeg 1024w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Cuba-alone-300x200.jpeg 300w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Cuba-alone-768x512.jpeg 768w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Cuba-alone-83x55.jpeg 83w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Cuba-alone-431x287.jpeg 431w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Cuba-alone-862x575.jpeg 862w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Cuba-alone.jpeg 1536w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> When the Prime Minister of Trinidad and Tobago and the President of Guyana met with the President of the United States, the headlines framed it as “regional diplomacy.” But many across the Caribbean are asking a deeper question: diplomacy for whom? And at what cost to Caribbean unity, sovereignty, and long‑standing principles. Because before flying to Washington, did these leaders sit with Cuba—the Caribbean nation most under pressure, most isolated, and most vulnerable to U.S. hostility? Did they consult the one country whose fate could reshape the entire region? For many Caribbean people, the answer feels like a painful no. CARICOM Was Built on Collective Strength—Not Selective Engagement CARICOM was never meant to be a club of convenience. It was designed as a shield—small nations standing together so none could be picked off or pressured alone. Historically, that meant: Coordinated foreign policy Mutual defense of sovereignty Solidarity with Cuba, especially when the U.S. tightened its grip A commitment to non‑alignment and regional independence So when two major CARICOM leaders meet the U.S. president without first building a unified Caribbean position—including Cuba—many see it as a break from the region’s founding principles. Cuba Has Stood With the Caribbean for Decades Whether one agrees with Cuba’s internal politics or not, the Caribbean knows the truth of its contributions: Thousands of doctors sent across the region Medical scholarships for Caribbean students Disaster relief after hurricanes Technical support in health, sports, and education Cuba has been a consistent partner—even when it had little to give. Yet today, as Cuba faces severe shortages, economic strangulation, and the threat of deeper confrontation with the United States, CARICOM’s response has been muted. A Meeting With Washington While Cuba Faces Pressure Sends a Message To many Caribbean observers, the optics are troubling: The U.S. issues travel advisories against Caribbean states The U.S. suspends immigrant visas for Caribbean nationals The U.S. pressures the region on migration and security The U.S. maintains a decades‑long embargo on Cuba And yet, CARICOM leaders rush to Washington without first strengthening ties with Havana. Some see this as a strategic misstep. Others call it a sellout that risks dividing CARICOM into “insiders” and “outsiders,” “favored” and “ignored,” “aligned” and “isolated.” What Caribbean People Are Asking Across the region, citizens are raising questions: Why wasn’t Cuba consulted before meeting the U.S.? Why is CARICOM silent while Cuba faces escalating pressure? Why do Caribbean leaders accept U.S. demands but not defend regional partners? Why meet the U.S. president before building a unified CARICOM position? These questions aren’t anti‑American—they are pro‑Caribbean. A Region Cannot Claim Unity While Leaving One Member Exposed Cuba is not a formal CARICOM member, but it has been a pillar of Caribbean cooperation for decades. To ignore Cuba at a moment of crisis is to weaken the moral foundation of the region. If CARICOM leaders want to preserve unity, they must: Engage Cuba directly Build a collective regional stance Resist divide‑and‑rule diplomacy Defend the principle of non‑interference Ensure no Caribbean nation stands alone under pressure The Caribbean Deserves Leadership Rooted in Courage, Not Fear Some believe Caribbean leaders are intimidated by the “big power up north.” Others argue they are trying to avoid confrontation. But the region has faced powerful nations before—and survived by standing together. If the Caribbean wants to avoid fragmentation, it must return to its core values: Solidarity Sovereignty Mutual respect Collective action Because unity is not built in Washington. It is built in the Caribbean—among Caribbean nations—starting with those who need support the most.
Dr. Bert Brathwaite joins DPM – Happy with ‘visionary leadership’
Dr. Bert Brathwaite, a respected medical doctor and longstanding member and supporter of the New National Party (NNP), has officially joined the Democratic People’s Movement (DPM).According to Brathwaite, he was drawn to the DPM because he sees “the embryo, the embryonic form, of a political party that reflects the kind […]
Dr. Bert Brathwaite, a respected medical doctor and longstanding member and supporter of the New National Party (NNP), has officially joined the Democratic People’s Movement (DPM). According to Brathwaite, he was drawn to the DPM because he sees “the embryo, the embryonic form, of a political party that reflects the kind of visionary leadership Grenada needs at this time’’. “I am happy with what I’ve seen so far — the groundwork, the ideas, and most importantly, the integrity of those leading it,’’ Brathwaite said, in formally announcing his membership of the Movement. He made the disclosure last Sunday in an exclusive interview on The Bubb Report that’s hosted by US-based Grenadian journalist and college communications instructor, Dr. Kellon Bubb. Brathwaite expressed confidence in the leadership role of MP Peter David in steering the DPM. “Mr. David has been unfairly portrayed in some quarters, but when you examine his record, you’ll find no suggestions of corruption. He has always acted with principle and intellect. Under a Peter David–led administration, Grenada can expect one of the cleanest periods of governance we have seen,’’ Brathwaite said. The medical doctor, who specializes in gastroenterology, lauded David’s ability to unite people across political divides. “He brings the temperament and experience to lead a government that is inclusive — one that could finally move beyond the politics of colour and bitterness that have set us back,’’ said Brathwaite, who also underscored the urgency of renewal in Grenadian politics. “We need leadership that can spur national development, embrace digital transformation, and inspire civic participation again. I see that potential in the DPM,’’ Brathwaite emphasized.
DPM to Hold First Congress on March 22 -Delegates to Elect Officers & Finalize Candidates
The Democratic People’s Movement (DPM) is about to host another major internal event — the inaugural Congress — of the organization, which has witnessed increased membership and a rapid rise in support in the four months since its formal launch.The first DPM Congress will be held on Sunday, March 22, […]
The Democratic People’s Movement (DPM) is about to host another major internal event — the inaugural Congress — of the organization, which has witnessed increased membership and a rapid rise in support in the four months since its formal launch. The first DPM Congress will be held on Sunday, March 22, at the Grenada Trade Centre in Morne Rouge. “This will be an annual event and our Congress will be one of the highest decision-making bodies of The Movement,’’ said DPM’s Peter David, who also is MP for the Town of St George. “On the agenda for the Congress of March 22 are the introduction and formal ratification of parliamentary candidates, who will represent the DPM in the upcoming general elections.’’ The Congress, the second milestone event of DPM, follows last November’s official launch, which also was held at the Trade Centre and attracted an audience that observers described as the largest non-government political gathering in recent years. “We are about ideas, policies and action. We are here to elevate politics above acrimony, to place issues over personalities, and to build a framework for governance that is transparent, accountable, and rooted in service,’’ David said in the keynote address at DPM’s formal launch. At the morning session of the Congress, accredited DPM delegates will nominate and vote on a full slate of Movement executive officers, including political leader. Election also will be held for other executive positions such as deputy leader, chairman, general secretary and treasurer. “The morning of the Congress is a working session in which delegates will be focused on the task of shaping The Movement’s future and ratifying the DPM Constitution,’’ said Alister Bain, who will be seeking a position on the executive of the organization. “This foundational document, the Constitution, outlines the party’s guiding principles, decision-making processes, and organizational structure.’’ DPM’s private morning session will be followed by an afternoon session, where ratified candidates and adopted resolutions will be presented to the nation. At the afternoon session, which is open to the public — including media — a partial slate of election candidates, spanning constituencies from Carriacou to St. Patrick, is expected to be unveiled. “This all-important Congress of DPM is not a political rally but a working meeting divided into two segments,’’ David emphasized. Since its founding, the DPM has positioned itself as a people-driven alternative to traditional politics. Throughout the past year, the movement has conducted nationwide consultations and listening sessions in various communities including Carriacou, where officials visited last Saturday, February 28. Feedback from every session and consultation directly informed several major policy proposals of the DPM. Among them is DPM’s Housing Empowerment Program, offering grants of $35,000 to $50,000 to help Grenadians under 35 years of age acquire their first homes. The housing initiative is part of the DPM’s wider Progressive Agenda for Empowerment, aimed at ensuring “Work That Pays and Stays,” “Food That Feeds Us,” and “Healthcare That Reaches You.” Complementing domestic policy innovation is the creation of a Diaspora Economic Council, a platform designed to link Grenadian professionals and investors in New York, Canada, and the United Kingdom with local opportunities in renewable energy, tourism, technology, and agriculture. In the aftermath of its formal launch, The Movement has gained momentum across parishes and within the Diaspora, attracting supporters from both the New National Party and the National Democratic Congress. Representatives of DPM have completed successful outreach visits to New York and Toronto, with plans underway for a London visit in the coming weeks. The Congress will be followed by a series of ongoing activities, including launching DPM constituency candidate campaigns across Grenada, Carriacou and Petite Martinique. The March 22 Congress of The Movement begins at 6:30 p.m.
Grenada Must Draw a Line: No Cuban Doctors, No Third‑Country Deportees
Grenada stands at a critical crossroads. Washington has intensified pressure on Caribbean nations—including Grenada—to distance themselves from Cuba’s medical cooperation program, imposing visa restrictions on Grenadian officials and framing Cuba’s overseas medical missions as “forced labor.” But this pressure campaign collides with a simple, unavoidable truth: Grenada’s healthcare system depends […]
<img decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Grenada-cuba-medical-cooperaion-1024x683.jpeg" alt="" class="wp-image-17888" style="aspect-ratio:1.4993160054719563;width:396px;height:auto" srcset="https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Grenada-cuba-medical-cooperaion-1024x683.jpeg 1024w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Grenada-cuba-medical-cooperaion-300x200.jpeg 300w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Grenada-cuba-medical-cooperaion-768x512.jpeg 768w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Grenada-cuba-medical-cooperaion-83x55.jpeg 83w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Grenada-cuba-medical-cooperaion-431x287.jpeg 431w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Grenada-cuba-medical-cooperaion-862x575.jpeg 862w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Grenada-cuba-medical-cooperaion.jpeg 1536w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> Grenada stands at a critical crossroads. Washington has intensified pressure on Caribbean nations—including Grenada—to distance themselves from Cuba’s medical cooperation program, imposing visa restrictions on Grenadian officials and framing Cuba’s overseas medical missions as “forced labor.” But this pressure campaign collides with a simple, unavoidable truth: Grenada’s healthcare system depends heavily on Cuban medical personnel, and losing them would create an immediate and dangerous shortage of doctors. If the United States insists that Grenada abandon a partnership essential to public health, then Grenada has every right—indeed, a responsibility—to say: If we cannot keep the Cuban doctors who sustain our healthcare system, we cannot accept third‑country deportees from the United States. This is not retaliation. It is self‑preservation. Cuban Doctors Are Not Optional—They Are Essential Grenadian leaders have repeatedly affirmed that Cuban medical teams are indispensable to the island’s healthcare system. Finance Minister Dennis Cornwall described their contribution as “irreplaceable,” noting that Grenada’s support for Cuba is rooted in legal, ethical, and moral obligation. For decades, Cuban doctors have staffed hospitals, filled specialist gaps, and provided care in rural communities where no alternatives exist. Without them, Grenada would face: Longer wait times for essential services Reduced access to specialists Strain on emergency and surgical capacity Higher mortality rates, especially among vulnerable populations The United States has not offered any replacement medical personnel, funding, or training programs to fill the gap it is attempting to create. Washington’s Pressure Campaign Creates an Impossible Double Standard The U.S. government has escalated its campaign against Cuba’s medical missions, imposing visa restrictions on officials from Cuba, African nations, and Grenada. At the same time, Washington continues to pressure Caribbean nations to accept third‑country deportees—people who are not citizens of Grenada but are being removed from the United States. This creates a contradiction: The U.S. demands Grenada weaken its healthcare system by abandoning Cuban doctors. The U.S. simultaneously expects Grenada to absorb additional social burdens by accepting deportees who will require housing, jobs, integration support, and in many cases medical care. Grenada cannot responsibly accept these deportees while its own healthcare capacity is being undermined. Grenada Has the Right—and the Duty—to Protect Its People Small island nations must often navigate geopolitical pressure from larger powers. But sovereignty includes the right to prioritize national wellbeing. Grenada can and should assert: Healthcare is a national security issue. A doctor shortage threatens lives more directly than any diplomatic dispute. Partnerships must be reciprocal. If the U.S. wants cooperation on deportees, it must respect Grenada’s right to maintain essential medical partnerships. No country should be forced to choose between diplomacy and public health. Grenada’s first obligation is to its citizens. This is not anti‑American. It is pro‑Grenadian. A Fair, Balanced Position for Grenada Grenada can articulate a principled stance: We value our relationship with the United States. We value our relationship with Cuba. We will not compromise the health and safety of our people. If Cuban doctors are removed due to U.S. pressure, we cannot accept third‑country deportees. This is a reasonable, responsible position grounded in national interest—not ideology. In conclusion: Grenada Must Stand Firm The United States has every right to shape its foreign policy. Grenada has the same right. If Washington insists on policies that would leave Grenada short of doctors, then Grenada must insist on policies that protect its own population. That means making it clear: No Cuban doctors, no third‑country deportees. A nation of 110,000 people cannot be expected to absorb additional burdens while its healthcare system is being weakened. Grenada must defend its sovereignty, its partnerships, and above all, the wellbeing of its citizens. By TL Neckles
Longtime NNP Supporter Brian McQueen joins DPM
Brian McQueen, a seasoned and prominent political activist resident in St. David, is bringing his experience to the Democratic People’s Movement (DPM), confident that The Movement is able to solve the problems confronting Grenada.“I have supported one of Grenada’s major parties for over 40 years, so I understand what is […]
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="1024" src="https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Brian-McQueen-1024x1024.jpeg" alt="" class="wp-image-17907" style="width:251px;height:auto" srcset="https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Brian-McQueen-1024x1024.jpeg 1024w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Brian-McQueen-300x300.jpeg 300w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Brian-McQueen-150x150.jpeg 150w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Brian-McQueen-768x768.jpeg 768w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Brian-McQueen-55x55.jpeg 55w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Brian-McQueen-431x431.jpeg 431w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Brian-McQueen-862x862.jpeg 862w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Brian-McQueen.jpeg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> Brian McQueen, a seasoned and prominent political activist resident in St. David, is bringing his experience to the Democratic People’s Movement (DPM), confident that The Movement is able to solve the problems confronting Grenada. “I have supported one of Grenada’s major parties for over 40 years, so I understand what is happening,’’ said McQueen, who has officially joined DPM. McQueen, who previously supported the New National Party (NNP), is a former personal assistant to ex-government minister Oliver Joseph, a two-time Member of Parliament for St. David. Joseph also has been an executive member of the NNP, serving as party chairman. McQueen’s membership of DPM was announced after weeks of traveling throughout Grenada, engaging with communities and observing the growing momentum behind The Movement. McQueen, explaining his decision to join the DPM, said he was compelled by what he witnessed on the ground. “For the past couple of weeks I’ve been traveling, already supporting, giving my wholehearted support to The Movement, because I recognize that this movement really has the solution for this country,’’ said McQueen. “The Movement is bringing a new change. It’s been a breath of fresh air for this country. We need to see things happen in a different way.’’ Grenadians ought to reflect seriously on the future, McQueen advised. “My brothers and sisters,’’ he asked, “what kind of life do you want to see for our young children in the next 15, in the next 20 years? Are you satisfied with how things are going these days?’’ McQueen is expected to be one of the delegates attending DPM’s first-ever Congress, March 22, 10 a.m., at the Grenada Trade Centre. A morning closed door session of the Congress will be followed by a public session, open to all Grenadians, beginning at 2 p.m. McQueen’s decision to leave behind four decades of NNP allegiance underscores the growing conviction among experienced political figures that Grenada is ready for a new direction — one rooted in integrity, community, and meaningful change.
Grenada National Reparations Committee (GNRC)Statement
Profoundly saddened at death of Rev. Jesse Jackson The Grenada National Reparations Committee (GNRC) is profoundly saddened at the death of Reverend Jesse Jackson.Like members of the GNRC, Rev. Jackson possessed a passion and determination in seeking redress for historical injustices, including chattel slavery, perpetrated against people of African descent.An […]
Profoundly saddened at death of Rev. Jesse Jackson The Grenada National Reparations Committee (GNRC) is profoundly saddened at the death of Reverend Jesse Jackson. Like members of the GNRC, Rev. Jackson possessed a passion and determination in seeking redress for historical injustices, including chattel slavery, perpetrated against people of African descent. An ordained Baptist Minister, Jackson died Tuesday, February 17, in Chicago. He was 84. Jackson, who became one of the most prominent civil and human rights leaders of the late 20th and early 21st centuries, was a protégé of the late Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. In Fact, in 1987, Donald L. Rheem — a staff writer with The Christian Science Monitor — described Jackson as, “one of the most successful Black leaders in American history’’. Jackson utilized various means in his drive for social, economic and political empowerment. He protested on the streets; he formed organizations such as the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition; and twice ran as a Democratic Party candidate for President of the United States of America. His influence extended beyond the borders of the U.S., engaging in overseas issues including negotiations in 1984 with former President Fidel Castro for the release of 22 Americans that were being held in Cuba. He also was an outspoken advocate for the end of the racist apartheid regime in South Africa. Jackson was the recipient of numerous awards, including the Presidential Medal of Freedom. He received it in 2000 from President Bill Clinton. The Reverend has left an indelible legacy that would only inspire the GNRC, as we continue on our mission of advancing the quest for reparations for people of African descent in Grenada and throughout the Caribbean region. We demand reparative justice for the countries of Africa and the Caribbean; repairs for past atrocities including enslavement, colonization and genocide; and repairs that embody respect for the innate right of every nation—big or small, in Africa, the Caribbean and Latin America and elsewhere—to claim and reclaim their sovereignty and freedom and to determine their own paths to economic development and prosperity. A church service and final celebration of the life of Rev. Jesse Jackson will be held in the U.S. on February 28. May he rest in eternal peace.
DPM backs Sex Offender Registry – Domestic Violence called ‘a national emergency’
The Democratic People’s Movement (DPM), led by Peter David, is calling for the urgent establishment of a National Sex Offenders’ Registry in Grenada in the wake of two recent killings and rising concern about domestic and sexual violence.The time has come to move from outrage to concrete action to tackle […]
The Democratic People’s Movement (DPM), led by Peter David, is calling for the urgent establishment of a National Sex Offenders’ Registry in Grenada in the wake of two recent killings and rising concern about domestic and sexual violence. The time has come to move from outrage to concrete action to tackle what is now “a national emergency’’, said David, a veteran MP and father of three girls. He emphasized that protecting women and girls, and other vulnerable people, and safeguarding them against tragedy, requires a coherent national strategy, not piecemeal responses. “We believe there should be a registry for sex offenders,” David stated on GBN’s To The Point, explaining that once an offender meets the legal threshold, “they should register. So, if John Brown comes in this community, the community should know, because John Brown is a sex offender.” The DPM leader, who is a lawyer by profession, argued that the registry must be part of a broader legal and social framework. He recommended the establishing of dedicated courts, or specialized court sessions, to deal specifically with sex offences; proposed psychological assessment and treatment for offenders while in custody; and also continued monitoring of high-risk offenders after release, including electronic monitoring where necessary. In addition, David also stressed the need for community-based mechanisms to track and supervise offenders in collaboration with law enforcement, so that communities are not left in the dark when known predators return to their neighbourhoods. Victims’ needs, said the leader of the Movement, must be central to any reform. “Our society needs to put resources into that,” he said, calling for counseling services, safe homes and shelters, and practical support for victims trying to escape abuse. “How many young women come to me and say, ‘I can’t take the abuse; I need a place to stay to get out, but I can’t get out because I don’t have a place to go.’” David also highlighted the role of families and communities in preventing violence, insisting that Grenada must invest in its people at the grassroots level. “We need to put resources into the communities; have constant sessions, where the community comes together and talks about the young people (and) what they need,’’ he said. “The DPM fully supports the longstanding public call for a Sex Offenders’ Registry. Domestic and sexual violence are now a national emergency. We must build a system – in law, in the courts, in our communities – that protects our people before tragedy strikes, not after.”
Grenada Cannot Ignore This Wake‑Up Call: The U.S. Travel Advisory Is a Warning, Not an Insult
By TL Neckles The United States raising its travel advisory for Grenada should hit every leader, policymaker, and citizen like a cold splash of water. This is not business as usual. This is not “outsiders exaggerating.” This is a direct consequence of a troubling rise in violent incidents—murders, shootings, and […]
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="1024" src="https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/crimes-increase.jpeg" alt="" class="wp-image-17881" style="width:292px;height:auto" srcset="https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/crimes-increase.jpeg 1024w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/crimes-increase-300x300.jpeg 300w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/crimes-increase-150x150.jpeg 150w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/crimes-increase-768x768.jpeg 768w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/crimes-increase-55x55.jpeg 55w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/crimes-increase-431x431.jpeg 431w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/crimes-increase-862x862.jpeg 862w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> By TL Neckles The United States raising its travel advisory for Grenada should hit every leader, policymaker, and citizen like a cold splash of water. This is not business as usual. This is not “outsiders exaggerating.” This is a direct consequence of a troubling rise in violent incidents—murders, shootings, and brazen acts of aggression—that have shaken the island’s sense of security. Grenada is a nation of just over 100,000 people. That means even a handful of violent crimes can send statistics skyrocketing. But let’s be honest: this isn’t just about numbers. It’s about perception, reputation, and the lived reality of Grenadians who are increasingly asking, “What is happening to our country?” A Small Island Cannot Afford Big Crime Grenada has long been known as one of the safest, most peaceful islands in the Caribbean. That reputation is not just a point of pride—it is a pillar of the economy. Tourism thrives on stability. Investors look for predictability. Diaspora communities advocate for home when they feel confident in its direction. So when shootings and murders begin to appear with uncomfortable frequency, the world notices. And when the world notices, advisories change. The U.S. travel advisory is not an attack on Grenada. It is a reflection of what the data—and the headlines—are showing. Ignoring it would be reckless. Downplaying it would be irresponsible. Responding to it with urgency is the only option. The Royal Grenada Police Force and Government Must Act—Now Grenadians are not asking for miracles. They are asking for leadership. They are asking for visibility. They are asking for a plan. The Royal Grenada Police Force and the Government of Grenada must move decisively: Increase patrols and visibility in vulnerable communities. Accelerate investigations and ensure swift prosecution of offenders. Strengthen intelligence gathering and community policing. Address the social conditions that allow violence to take root. Silence is not strategy. Slowness is not stability. Grenada needs action that is firm, coordinated, and sustained. This Is the Moment to Use Grenada’s Own Expertise: Dr. Chitan Grenada is not short on talent. One of the region’s most respected crime‑prevention specialists, Dr. Neals J. Chitan, is right here on the island. His expertise in social crime prevention, community transformation, and violence reduction is not theoretical—it is proven across multiple countries. If ever there was a moment to fully utilize his services, it is now. Dr. Chitan’s approach goes beyond policing. He focuses on: Changing mindsets and behaviors in at‑risk communities Strengthening family structures Building resilience in youth Creating long‑term cultural shifts away from violence Grenada does not need to reinvent the wheel. It needs to empower the experts it already has. A Country at a Crossroads Grenada is too small, too beautiful, and too full of potential to allow violence to take root. A few bad actors cannot be allowed to define the nation’s future. A handful of crimes cannot be allowed to derail decades of progress. But pretending the problem is small will not make it small. The U.S. advisory is a warning sign. The recent crimes are a wake‑up call. The responsibility now lies with the authorities to respond with urgency—and with the public to demand accountability. Grenada can turn this moment around. But only if it acts boldly, swiftly, and intelligently. And that begins with using every resource available—including the expertise of Dr. Chitan—to restore safety, confidence, and pride in the Spice Isle.
February 18 dawned bright over Grenada, the kind of morning when the sea itself seemed to whisper memories. Today would have been the 104th birthday of Sir Eric Matthew Gairy, the island’s first Prime Minister and the man many still call the father of independence. In the quiet villages and […]
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="706" height="823" src="https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/gairy2.jpeg" alt="" class="wp-image-17877" style="width:342px;height:auto" srcset="https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/gairy2.jpeg 706w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/gairy2-257x300.jpeg 257w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/gairy2-47x55.jpeg 47w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/gairy2-431x502.jpeg 431w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 706px) 100vw, 706px" /> February 18 dawned bright over Grenada, the kind of morning when the sea itself seemed to whisper memories. Today would have been the 104th birthday of Sir Eric Matthew Gairy, the island’s first Prime Minister and the man many still call the father of independence. In the quiet villages and the bustling towns, people spoke his name with a mixture of pride and reflection. For the older generation, he was not just a leader — he was the young man who returned from Aruba in the 1950s with fire in his spirit and justice on his tongue. He had no university degree, no polished pedigree, no elite connections. What he had was conviction. They remembered how he walked the estates, listening to the workers who bent their backs under the sun for pennies. How he organized them, fought for them, and demanded what no one else dared to ask for: An eight‑hour workday Better wages Human dignity Those victories changed the rhythm of rural life forever. By midday, schoolchildren recited stories of Expo ’69 — the grand showcase that put Grenada on the world’s map — and the Easter Water Parade, a celebration of culture and joy that flowed through the streets like a river of unity. Many of the schools they sat in were built during his tenure, physical reminders of a leader who believed education should reach every child, not only the privileged. But history is never a straight line. As the years passed, a new generation of university‑educated youth returned home, filled with ideas, ambition, and impatience. Their vision clashed with his. Disruptions grew. The island trembled with tension. Sir Eric, without the academic credentials of his critics, found himself challenged not just politically but personally — yet he remained steadfast in his belief that leadership came from service, not certificates. As the sun set on this 104th anniversary, Grenadians reflected on a life that shaped the nation’s destiny. Sir Eric Gairy was imperfect, determined, controversial, visionary — but above all, he was a man who dared to lift the poor, challenge the powerful, and dream of an independent Grenada long before others believed it possible. And so, on this February 18, his legacy lived again — in the rights workers enjoy, in the schools that still stand, in the independence that defines the nation, and in the unshakable truth that greatness can rise from humble soil.
DPM’s two-lane approach to fixing “healthcare crisis’’
Democratic People’s Movement (DPM) leader, MP Peter David, has challenged the Grenada government’s handling of healthcare, revealing that tens of millions of dollars in approved health budgets remain unspent while clinics lack basic supplies and families suffer.“People ask me, ‘Peter, are you against the new hospital’? Of course, not. I’m […]
Democratic People’s Movement (DPM) leader, MP Peter David, has challenged the Grenada government’s handling of healthcare, revealing that tens of millions of dollars in approved health budgets remain unspent while clinics lack basic supplies and families suffer. “People ask me, ‘Peter, are you against the new hospital’? Of course, not. I’m against pretending the future isn’t planned by the present,’’ David stated. “Healthcare has to run on two lanes at the same time—what we do now and what we build for later.’’ David exposed a troubling pattern of fiscal mismanagement, pointing to EC$64 million in unspent healthcare funds last year, and EC$16 million left unused this year. “When a clinic closes or runs out of oxygen, families pay the price. That is not a resource problem. That is a priority problem,’’ he emphasized in a podcast. The DPM leader, and parliamentary representative for the Town of St George, outlined immediate, actionable solutions for “Lane One’’— addressing today’s current crisis. “Stock clinics with essential medicine now,’’ he urged. “The money was approved. EC$64 million went unspent last year. Use it. Keep medical stations operational with oxygen and basic supplies.’’ David’s comprehensive plan includes deploying mobile health units to rural communities, and expanding telemedicine services so patients don’t have to travel for specialist consultations. Most critically, he added, is reviving the government nursing school with scholarships tied to service commitments. “You train here, you serve here,’’ explained David, a former Grenada Foreign Affairs Minister. For “Lane Two’’—building the future—David advocates completing groundwork for National Health Insurance to ensure income doesn’t determine access to care; modernizing health clinics; and, integrating mental health into primary care. “Here’s the point: these two lanes do not compete. They reinforce each other,’’ said David. “But, instead, the government cuts the health budget, leaves EC$64 million unspent, and promises a hospital with no public cost, no timeline, no financing plan.’’ What’s needed is a health system that works for all the people of Grenada, Carriacou and Petite Martinique, said David. “Healthcare that works means running care in your parish today and a stronger system for your children tomorrow,’’ he said. “That is solving problems, not making promises. First, we question why today keeps losing to tomorrow. Then, we organize healthcare into two lanes. Finally, we move forward together.’’
A New Chapter in Grenadian Politics: The Unification of Dr. Keith Mitchell and Michael Baptiste
In a surprising turn of events within Grenada’s political landscape, former Prime Minister Dr. Keith Mitchell and former Agriculture Minister Michael Baptiste have put aside years of political tension to unite under the New National Party (NNP). This unexpected alliance comes in the wake of serious allegations and a history […]
In a surprising turn of events within Grenada’s political landscape, former Prime Minister Dr. Keith Mitchell and former Agriculture Minister Michael Baptiste have put aside years of political tension to unite under the New National Party (NNP). This unexpected alliance comes in the wake of serious allegations and a history of conflict between the two figures, highlighting the complexities of Grenadian politics. The roots of their discord trace back to accusations exchanged over financial mismanagement involving funds from the Japanese government. Dr. Mitchell, during his tenure, accused Baptiste of neglecting to deposit substantial funding into the national treasury, alleging that Baptiste kept the money for personal expenses. Baptiste countered Mitchell’s claims by asserting that the funds were rightfully intended for his operational costs as a minister, setting the stage for a public feud between the two political veterans. As tensions escalated, Baptiste leveled accusations of his own against Mitchell, branding him as corrupt. He pointed to the millions of dollars allocated for a call center initiative led by Mitchell’s family members, which ultimately collapsed, resulting in significant financial losses. Such accusations not only tarnished Mitchell’s reputation but also raised critical questions about the management of government contracts and accountability. Further complicating the narrative, Baptiste highlighted Mitchell’s dealings with international investors like EJ Miller and Eric Resteiner, who allegedly received access to local bank funds but failed to launch promised projects. Instead, they reportedly vanished with the money, leaving the Grenadian government to cover financial shortfalls. These allegations painted a picture of a government infrastructure riddled with potential corruption, making Baptiste’s criticisms resonate deeply with the public. Despite their tumultuous relationship and the serious charges exchanged, the dynamic in Grenada’s political arena has shifted significantly. In a remarkable development, both Mitchell and Baptiste have reunited within the NNP, aiming to challenge the ruling National Democratic Congress (NDC) led by Prime Minister Dickon Mitchell. This collaboration signifies not only a strategic political maneuver but also an acknowledgment of a shared goal to reclaim power amidst ongoing governance challenges. Their unification has sparked discussions across Grenada, as citizens reflect on the implications of their past confrontations and the potential for future governance. The alliance raises questions about political integrity, with constituents eager to see if this renewed partnership can effectively address the pressing issues facing the nation. As the NNP prepares to campaign against the NDC, Grenadians will be watching closely to determine whether the experience and insights that both Mitchell and Baptiste bring can translate into effective leadership. The political landscape is now more dynamic than ever, as former rivals join forces, highlighting the complexities and often unpredictable nature of Grenadian politics. The collaboration between Dr. Keith Mitchell and Michael Baptiste marks a significant moment in Grenada’s political history. As they set their sights on the electoral horizon, both leaders will need to address the concerns of their constituents while proving their commitment to transparent and accountable governance. The coming months will undoubtedly be pivotal in reshaping the future of Grenadian politics.
DPM’s Housing Plan & Economic Reforms – These programmes will pay for themselves
The Democratic People’s Movement (DPM) has released a detailed breakdown of funding mechanisms for its three-pillar economic platform, following earlier announcements of proposed housing grants, food security initiatives, and healthcare reforms.DPM Leader Peter David addressed questions about the platform’s fiscal sustainability head-on, presenting what he calls a “virtuous cycle’’ of […]
The Democratic People’s Movement (DPM) has released a detailed breakdown of funding mechanisms for its three-pillar economic platform, following earlier announcements of proposed housing grants, food security initiatives, and healthcare reforms. DPM Leader Peter David addressed questions about the platform’s fiscal sustainability head-on, presenting what he calls a “virtuous cycle’’ of economic investment rather than traditional government spending. “The Movement is built on three anchors – Work, Food, Healthcare,’’ David declared. “People ask how we pay for it, like it is a ‘gotcha’ question. But the truth is, these policies are not just expenses. They are investments that pay for themselves.’’ The DPM’s housing grant programme proposes $35,000 EC for singles and $50,000 EC for couples, targeting 1,000 young Grenadians over five years at a total cost of approximately $500 million EC. This amount, David emphasized, equals “roughly five months of the national budget spread over five years’’. The programme, he said, is designed to generate construction jobs, building supply purchases, and property tax revenue. “A generation building equity here instead of sending rent money abroad,’’ David explained, noting the multiplier effect of keeping capital within Grenada’s economy. David, addressing Grenada’s import dependency, outlined how food security investments would self-finance through import substitution. “Breaking that cycle is not charity,’’ said David. “We send hundreds of millions abroad every year importing food we can grow ourselves. Every dollar we shift to local production is a dollar that stays here.’’ The DPM’s agricultural initiative aims to redirect import expenditure toward local farmers, creating jobs and market growth, while simultaneously reducing the national food bill. On healthcare, David identified systemic inefficiency as the primary obstacle, arguing that it’s not a problem of funding shortfalls. “Millions in funding already goes unspent while patients wait. This is not a money problem. It is a priority problem,’’ said David, whose DPM proposal is to stock medical clinics with supplies, deploy mobile units, and retain healthcare workers. “Healthy people work. Working people earn. Earning people spend. The economy grows,’’ David said. “It is strategy. We organize a budget that reflects real priorities and move forward – together.’’
Why Are Grenada and Other Caribbean Nations Accepting Third‑Country Deportees?
By TL Neckles A Look at Power, Pressure, and the Realities Facing Small States Across the Caribbean, people are asking a blunt and reasonable question: why are small island nations—already stretched by limited resources, limited jobs, and fragile economies—being asked to accept deportees and third‑country nationals from the United States, […]
By TL Neckles <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/usa-deportees-01-1024x683.jpeg" alt="" class="wp-image-17868" style="aspect-ratio:1.499330655957162;width:443px;height:auto" srcset="https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/usa-deportees-01-1024x683.jpeg 1024w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/usa-deportees-01-300x200.jpeg 300w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/usa-deportees-01-768x512.jpeg 768w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/usa-deportees-01-83x55.jpeg 83w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/usa-deportees-01-431x287.jpeg 431w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/usa-deportees-01-862x575.jpeg 862w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/usa-deportees-01.jpeg 1536w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> A Look at Power, Pressure, and the Realities Facing Small States Across the Caribbean, people are asking a blunt and reasonable question: why are small island nations—already stretched by limited resources, limited jobs, and fragile economies—being asked to accept deportees and third‑country nationals from the United States, especially at a moment when the U.S. has issued travel advisories against these same countries and suspended immigrant visa processing for their citizens? The contradiction is hard to ignore. Caribbean nationals face closed doors, yet Caribbean governments are expected to open theirs. This tension isn’t new, but it has become more visible. Understanding it requires looking at geopolitics, economic vulnerability, and the long history of unequal relationships between large powers and small states. <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="683" height="1024" src="https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/USA-deportees02-683x1024.jpeg" alt="" class="wp-image-17869" style="aspect-ratio:0.6670152323190073;width:321px;height:auto" srcset="https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/USA-deportees02-683x1024.jpeg 683w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/USA-deportees02-200x300.jpeg 200w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/USA-deportees02-768x1152.jpeg 768w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/USA-deportees02-37x55.jpeg 37w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/USA-deportees02-431x647.jpeg 431w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/USA-deportees02-862x1293.jpeg 862w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/USA-deportees02.jpeg 1024w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 683px) 100vw, 683px" /> 1. Small States Don’t Operate in a Vacuum Grenada, St. Lucia, Antigua, Dominica, St. Vincent, and others are sovereign nations—but they are also small economies deeply tied to global powers. Their survival depends on: – Tourism – Remittances – Trade access – Development loans – Security cooperation – Disaster relief When a major power applies pressure—whether through visa restrictions, travel advisories, or diplomatic demands—it can destabilize these pillars. Even if the tools seem “soft,” they carry real consequences. For a small state, one travel advisory can wipe out a tourism season. One visa suspension can disrupt families, students, and workers. One diplomatic freeze can slow aid or investment. So Caribbean governments often choose the path that avoids escalation, even when the demands feel unfair. 2. Migration Agreements Are Often Unequal by Design Many countries—especially small ones—sign migration or repatriation agreements with the U.S. because: – They rely on U.S. cooperation in other areas – They fear economic retaliation – They want to avoid being labeled “non‑cooperative” – They hope compliance will lead to better treatment later These agreements sometimes include accepting third‑country nationals who passed through their territory, even if they never lived there. It’s not about fear of a single leader or administration. It’s about the structural imbalance between a superpower and microstates. 3. Travel Advisories and Visa Suspensions Are Tools of Leverage When the U.S. issues a travel advisory or suspends immigrant visas, it sends a message—one that Caribbean governments cannot ignore. Even though these measures are not military or economic sanctions, they still: – Hurt tourism – Damage reputation – Create uncertainty for investors – Disrupt families and diaspora ties – Signal that cooperation is expected For a country like Grenada, where tourism is the economic lifeline, a travel advisory is not symbolic. It is a direct hit. 4. Why Accept Deportees When Resources Are Limited? Caribbean governments often justify acceptance by saying: – They want to maintain diplomatic stability – They hope cooperation will prevent harsher measures – They want to avoid being blacklisted – They fear losing access to aid or development programs – They believe refusing could worsen conditions for their own nationals abroad But the truth is simpler: small states have limited leverage. They cannot afford a prolonged confrontation with a country that controls: – Their largest tourism market – Their largest diaspora population – Their main trade routes – Their access to international financial systems This is not cowardice. It is the reality of global power. 5. Why Is the U.S. Sending More People to the Caribbean? From the U.S. perspective, the logic is bureaucratic: – If someone passed through a Caribbean country, that country becomes “responsible” under certain migration frameworks. – If a Caribbean national commits an offense in the U.S., they must be repatriated. – If the U.S. wants to reduce its migrant backlog, it pressures transit countries to take people back. But from the Caribbean perspective, it feels like: – A double standard – A burden without support – A policy that ignores the region’s capacity And many Caribbean citizens see it as part of a long pattern where powerful nations offload problems onto smaller ones. 6. Caribbean Nations Need to Build Better Lives for Their People—But They Need Space to Do It You’re absolutely right that Caribbean countries need: – More jobs – More investment – More opportunities for youth – Stronger healthcare and education – More resilient economies But these goals become harder when: – Travel advisories scare away tourists – Visa suspensions block mobility – Deportations strain social services – External pressure dictates domestic policy Small states cannot build strong societies while constantly managing crises created elsewhere. 7. So Why Do They Comply? Not because they want to. Not because they agree. Not because they are weak. But because the global system is stacked against small nations, and the Caribbean has learned—over centuries—that survival sometimes requires strategic compromise. Caribbean leaders often choose the option that avoids immediate harm, even if it creates long‑term frustration. 8. The Bigger Question: What Does a Fair Relationship Look Like? Caribbean people are increasingly asking: – Why should we accept deportees when our own citizens face barriers abroad? – Why should we absorb third‑country nationals when we struggle to support our own? – Why should travel advisories and visa suspensions be used as pressure tactics? – Why isn’t there more investment in Caribbean development instead of shifting burdens onto the region? These are legitimate questions. They deserve serious answers.
America Is Running Out of Time to Pretend Donald Trump Doesn’t Mean What He Says
By TL Neckles There comes a point in every democracy’s decline when denial becomes complicity. When the danger is no longer hidden, coded, or subtle. When the aspiring strongman stops hinting and starts declaring. America has reached that point. Donald Trump is now openly suggesting that the midterm elections should […]
By TL Neckles <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="576" height="782" src="https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Democracy-in-danger.jpeg" alt="" class="wp-image-17861" style="aspect-ratio:0.7365894566380382;width:288px;height:auto" srcset="https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Democracy-in-danger.jpeg 576w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Democracy-in-danger-221x300.jpeg 221w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Democracy-in-danger-41x55.jpeg 41w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Democracy-in-danger-431x585.jpeg 431w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 576px) 100vw, 576px" /> There comes a point in every democracy’s decline when denial becomes complicity. When the danger is no longer hidden, coded, or subtle. When the aspiring strongman stops hinting and starts declaring. America has reached that point. Donald Trump is now openly suggesting that the midterm elections should be suspended—or that he should simply take them by force. Many Americans, conditioned by years of chaos, treat this as another outrageous remark, another headline-grabbing provocation. But this is not new. Trump has always revealed his intentions long before acting on them. The problem is not that he hides his ambitions. The problem is that America refuses to believe him. The Strongman Who Narrates His Own Playbook Trump’s political career is a masterclass in saying the quiet part out loud. He does not cloak his intentions in legalese or diplomatic language. He announces them. He telegraphs them. He repeats them until they become normalized. He told us he might not accept the results of the 2016 election. He told us he would only lose in 2020 if the election was rigged. He told us he wanted to “terminate” parts of the Constitution. He told us he admired leaders who rule without constraint. He told us he wanted the military to act as his personal force. He told us he wanted to prosecute political opponents. He told us he wanted to stay in power indefinitely. And now he is telling us he wants to suspend elections. At some point, the burden shifts from the man making the threats to the nation refusing to take them seriously. The American Habit of Underestimating Authoritarians Americans like to believe that authoritarianism is something that happens elsewhere—something foreign, exotic, incompatible with the American character. But authoritarianism is not a foreign import. It is a human impulse. It thrives wherever institutions are weak, norms are eroded, and citizens convince themselves that “it can’t happen here.” History is full of nations that believed their institutions were strong enough—until the moment they weren’t. Hungary believed its courts and parliament would hold the line. Turkey believed its military would protect the republic. Venezuela believed its elections were too sacred to undermine. Germany believed its constitution was unbreakable. In each case, the aspiring strongman announced his intentions long before acting on them. In each case, the public dismissed the warnings as exaggeration. In each case, the institutions that were supposed to stop him were already compromised. America is not immune to the forces that have undone other democracies. It is simply earlier in the process. The Infrastructure of Authoritarianism Is Already Under Construction Authoritarianism does not arrive in a single dramatic moment. It is built brick by brick, appointment by appointment, norm violation by norm violation. Trump has spent years placing loyalists in key positions across government—people who believe their loyalty is owed to him personally, not to the Constitution. He has reshaped agencies, pressured state officials, and rewarded those who show obedience. He has turned once‑independent institutions into political battlegrounds. This is not speculation. It is documented behavior. When a leader surrounds himself with people who believe the president is above the law, the danger is not theoretical. It is structural. The Most Terrifying Question: Who Stops a Leader Who Refuses to Leave? The fear many Americans now whisper—quietly, nervously—is simple: If Trump crosses the line into outright authoritarian rule, who will stop him? Who enforces the law when the lawbreaker is the one giving the orders? Who removes a president who refuses to accept defeat? Who challenges a commander‑in‑chief who claims absolute authority? These are not academic questions. They are the questions that determine whether a democracy survives or collapses. The Military Is Not a Safety Net Some Americans comfort themselves with the belief that the military will act as a safeguard. But the military is not a monolith. It is an institution made of people—people who have been praised, attacked, pressured, and politicized by Trump for years. Trump has repeatedly tried to blur the line between the military as a national institution and the military as an extension of his personal power. He praises generals who obey him and attacks those who do not. He has publicly fantasized about using the military to suppress dissent. Even if the military refuses to follow unlawful orders, the mere fact that this question is now relevant should terrify every American. The Danger Is Not That Trump Hides His Intentions—It’s That He Announces Them Democracy does not die quietly. It dies in broad daylight, while citizens convince themselves that the threat is exaggerated, that institutions are stronger than they are, that “it can’t happen here.” But Trump is not hiding his intentions. He is broadcasting them. The danger is not that he whispers. The danger is that he shouts—and the country still refuses to listen. The Time for Denial Is Over If Trump is openly musing about suspending elections, America cannot afford to treat it as entertainment or hyperbole. It must be treated as what it is: a direct challenge to the democratic order. The question is no longer whether Trump means what he says. The question is whether the country will finally take him seriously. Because if we wait until the moment he acts, it will already be too late.
Bangladesh’s T20 World Cup Participation Hangs in the Balance Amid Dispute Over Match Venues
Bangladesh’s place at next month’s T20 World Cup has been thrown into uncertainty after the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) doubled down on its request to move the team’s group‑stage matches from India to Sri Lanka. The dispute has quickly escalated into a broader debate about safety, fairness, and the long‑standing […]
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="1024" src="https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/ICC-T20-WC.jpeg" alt="" class="wp-image-17857" style="width:272px;height:auto" srcset="https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/ICC-T20-WC.jpeg 1024w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/ICC-T20-WC-300x300.jpeg 300w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/ICC-T20-WC-150x150.jpeg 150w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/ICC-T20-WC-768x768.jpeg 768w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/ICC-T20-WC-55x55.jpeg 55w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/ICC-T20-WC-431x431.jpeg 431w, https://spiceislander.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/ICC-T20-WC-862x862.jpeg 862w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> Bangladesh’s place at next month’s T20 World Cup has been thrown into uncertainty after the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) doubled down on its request to move the team’s group‑stage matches from India to Sri Lanka. The dispute has quickly escalated into a broader debate about safety, fairness, and the long‑standing perception that the International Cricket Council (ICC) bends more easily to the wishes of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) than to any other member nation. A Request Rooted in Security Concerns The BCB’s appeal stems from rising political and social tensions between Bangladesh and India. Officials in Dhaka argue that the current climate poses legitimate safety risks for players, staff, and traveling supporters. With Sri Lanka already serving as co‑host for the tournament, Bangladesh insists that shifting their matches there is both practical and prudent. However, on Wednesday the ICC rejected the request outright, stating that there was an “absence of any credible security threat.” The governing body then gave the BCB 24 hours to consult with the Bangladeshi government and confirm whether the team will participate under the existing schedule. The ultimatum places Bangladesh in a difficult position: either accept the ICC’s ruling and play in India, or withdraw from the tournament entirely—an outcome that would carry sporting, financial, and political consequences. A Familiar Pattern of Uneven Treatment For many observers, this dispute is not happening in a vacuum. It taps into a long‑standing frustration shared by several cricketing nations: the belief that the ICC routinely accommodates India’s demands while expecting smaller boards to simply comply. Critics point to the most recent example—the ICC tournament hosted in Pakistan. India refused to travel to Pakistan citing security concerns, yet instead of insisting on neutrality or shared sacrifice, the ICC allowed India to play all their matches in Dubai. This arrangement gave India a clear competitive advantage: no travel fatigue, consistent pitch conditions, and a stable base of operations. Other teams, meanwhile, were required to shuttle between venues and adapt to varying conditions. To many, the contrast is glaring. When India raises security concerns, the ICC adjusts the entire tournament structure. When Bangladesh raises similar concerns, the ICC dismisses them as unfounded. The Power Dynamics Behind the Game No one denies India’s enormous influence in world cricket. The BCCI is the sport’s financial engine, generating the majority of global cricket revenue. But the question is whether financial power should translate into disproportionate decision‑making authority—especially when it undermines the principles of fairness and equal treatment that international sport is supposed to uphold. Bangladesh’s request is not unprecedented. Teams have asked for venue changes before, and the ICC has accommodated them when the requesting nation had enough leverage. The issue, then, is not whether the request is unreasonable—it’s whether the ICC applies its standards consistently. What Happens Next The BCB now faces a tight deadline and a high‑stakes decision. If the Bangladeshi government advises the team to proceed, the players will travel to India under the ICC’s assurances. If the government refuses, Bangladesh may be forced to withdraw, triggering diplomatic fallout and disappointing millions of fans. Regardless of the outcome, the controversy has reignited a broader conversation about governance in world cricket. Smaller nations continue to question whether the ICC truly represents all its members—or whether it has become an institution where some voices matter far more than others. Bangladesh’s stand, whether successful or not, exposes a deeper truth: the future credibility of global cricket depends on transparency, fairness, and the courage to treat every nation—big or small—with equal respect.